On 2014-11-20, jstnms...@gmail.com <jstnms...@gmail.com> wrote: > I write this to address the criticism which targets a user's lack of > responsibility for the real/implied/insinuated failings of the docs. > As a relatively inexperienced student of programming, I am not in any > position to contribute/edit the documents.
Wrong. As an inexperienced user, you are _exactly_ the right person to contribute/edit the documents. A documents _always_ make sense to the author and to somebody who already knows the information. They are often not capable of seeing what's wrong. It's those who are _not_ familiar with the subject matter who can often make the most valuable contributions. > THAT DOES NOT, however, DENY THE CATEGORICAL STUPIDITY OF THE > DOCUMENTATION: . Not only are the semantics of the editors in > question, but so are the syntactical and grammatical conventions, > too. Then send in suggestions, corrections and improvements. Or pony up and actually take over maintenance of one of the documents you think is so bad. The authors of the documentation aren't _intentionally_ writing things that other people don't understand. If you don't understand the documentation or think it needs to be extended/expanded, then help _do_ it. Just telling somebody "the document you wrote SUCKS!" is not even a _tiny_ bit helpful. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Everybody gets free at BORSCHT! gmail.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list