---------------------------- On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 11:06 AM CET Stefan Behnel wrote:
>Albert-Jan Roskam schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 21:28: >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote: >> For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest >> https://github.com/fijal/jitpy >> >> Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead >> of pypy. > >I think this is trying to position PyPy more in the same corner as other >JIT compilers for CPython, as opposed to keeping it a completely separate >thing which suffers from being "not CPython". It's a huge dependency, but >so are others. You mean like psyco? Well, if implementation differences between cpython and pypy are a problem, it might be useful. I've only come across a few unimportant ones. Bu then, I never reimplement __del__. http://pypy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/cpython_differences.html >Being able to choose tools at this level is great, so if PyPy becomes yet >another way to speed up the critical 5% of a CPython application, that's a >good thing. Totally agree, provided that 5 % makes a practical difference ("wow, it runs 5 ns faster now" :-)) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
