Volker Grabsch wrote: > > I noticed that many packages in the PyPI are using the PSF License. > Does this have a special reason?
Personally I used Python style license to express that you can do with some of my modules exactly what you can do with Python itself. > So if it is complicated to include an LGPL'ed Python library in the > Python standard libraries, I'd release it under PSF License. Unfortunately the Python style license is not suitable to reach that goal. Recommended reading: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq > Also, a quick overview about the various licenses would be nice. Maybe biased: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html Ciao, Michael. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
