In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> > AttributeError: 'Sub' object has no attribute '__bases__'
>
> In this message, 'Sub' is an adjective, modifying 'object, not naming
> it. If you attend to the last line of the traceback
>
My first reaction is to look at 'Sub' as a noun, not an adjective, since
I know that NAME well on my code as being a noun. Meanwhile I know that
objects may be qualified (adjectivized) as class objects or instance
objects. So, I also happen to look at the word "object" as an adjective,
as Python object semantics would me do.
What you propose is that I look at that phrase the other way around,
which is kind of contrarian to how you actually use them in your code.
> > AttributeError: 'Sub' instance has no attribute '__bases__',
>
> 'Sub' is an instance of 'type', so "'Sub' instance" could also be taken
> to mean the class if the traceback were ignored.
I agree. Sub instance is still somewhat ambiguous. So, maybe:
AttributeError: Instance of object 'Sub' has no attribute
'__bases__'
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
