On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote:
>> Sure. Not sure how you'd cope with an interior FFFF in the stream
>> without drastically losing efficiency, though.
>
>
> That's why it was base 65535, not 65536.

Doh. Yeah. I autocorrected in my head, but yes, base 65535 is safe.

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to