On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:56 PM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote: > On 04/22/2015 09:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote: >>> On 04/22/2015 09:30 PM, Cem Karan wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Another slightly more involved idea: >>>>> >>>>> Make the events pickleable, and save the simulator only for every 100th >>>>> (for >>>>> example) event. To restore the 7531th state load pickle 7500 and apply >>>>> events 7501 to 7531. >>>> >>>> >>>> I was hoping to avoid doing this as I lose information. BUT, its likely >>>> that this will be the best approach regardless of what other methods I use; >>>> there is just too much data. >>>> >>> >>> Why would that lose any information??? >> >> It loses information if event processing isn't perfectly deterministic. > > Quite right. But I hadn't seen anything in this thread to imply that.
My apologies, that's my fault. I should have mentioned that in the first place. Thanks, Cem Karan -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
