why (x**2 with(x))<(x**3 with(x)) is not taken in consideration?

If 'with' must be there (and substitue 'lambda:') then at least the 
syntax is clear.IMO Ruby syntax is also clear.

        

        
                
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to