why (x**2 with(x))<(x**3 with(x)) is not taken in consideration? If 'with' must be there (and substitue 'lambda:') then at least the syntax is clear.IMO Ruby syntax is also clear.
___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list