On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 10:06:31 AM UTC-4, Stefan Ram wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
> >Your approach using .join is what I was looking for.
>
> I'd appreciate a report of your measurements.
# Original Approach
# -----------------
ss = ss.split("\n")
ss1 = ""
for sdata in ss:
ss1 = ss1 + (sdata[OFFSET:] + "\n")
# Chris's Approach
# ----------------
lines = ss.split("\n")
new_text = "\n".join(line[8:] for line in lines)
Test #1, Number of Characters: 165110
Original Approach: 18ms
Chris's Approach: 1ms
Test #2, Number of Characters: 470763
Original Approach: 593ms
Chris's Approach: 16ms
Test #3, Number of Characters: 944702
Original Approach: 2.824s
Chris's Approach: 47ms
Test #4, Number of Characters: 5557394
Original Approach: 122s
Chris's Approach: 394ms
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
