Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > Benjamin Niemann wrote: >> Some (many?) people don't like the unittest module, because it is not >> very pythonic - nothing to wonder as it has its root in the Java world. >> That's probably one of the reasons why there are other (more pythonic) >> unittesting frameworks for Python out there. > > So I think it would have been better that "unittest" had been named > "PUnit" to make clear that it is a JUnit port and to allow a more > pythonic testing framework to be added to the Python's standard lib.
It was called PyUnit before it was integrated into the stdlib. Dunno why it was renamed... -- Benjamin Niemann Email: pink at odahoda dot de WWW: http://www.odahoda.de/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list