On 12/01/16 07:13, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 11Jan2016 23:55, Erik <pyt...@lucidity.plus.com> wrote:
Is it complaining about that, or is it because the 'for' loop body
might be executed zero times?
The former. Almost any loop _might_ be executed zero times. Compilers
and linters etc should only complain if they can prove the loop is
always executed zero times.
Sure, but Skip was thinking he'd found a bug - I was just raising the
possibility that the bug could have been that the loop was (incorrectly)
determined to be executed zero times for some reason.
E.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
