Bernardo Sulzbach <mafagafogiga...@gmail.com> writes: > Mr. Finney, that would be Google itself.
Yep. You're the one who needs to interact with them because as a user of the program, it's you they're trying to please (more than me, at least). Can't work out how to interact with a corporation and get into correspondence about a bug in their software? That's probably a good sign you shouldn't be using their software :-) > I have never bothered setting up a client such as Mutt and can't even > name more than Outlook and Mutt. You'll know your needs more than me. Maybe you could start with Thunderbird (available in Debian as “Icedove” because of trademark issues); that's a good all-round client that behaves well. > I must say that the way you put it makes sense. A "reply" to the last > message targeting its sender (the person that wrote it) is very > reasonable indeed. Thanks. This is a contentious issue, and some people want to mangle your messages;but that doesn't mean it's still open for debate — one side is right :-) -- \ “I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at | `\ the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour …” —F. H. Wales, 1936 | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
