On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:40, Ian Kelly wrote: > Besides, you're forgetting that the whole point of having so many > backwards incompatible changes in Python 3 in the first place was to > get them out of the way and not have to do them further into the > future. Python 4.0 has never been planned to be anything more than an > incremental release like Python 2.0, and AIUI the only reason any of > the core devs are even talking about Python 4 at this point in time is > because Guido doesn't like "3.10" as a version number.
I still think we should just retroactively declare 3.5 to be python 5, and then keep going with python 6, 7, etc... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list