On 17/03/2016 21:26, BartC wrote:
On 17/03/2016 21:11, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>:
Like every language *including* English. You can pretend that ASCII is
enough, but you do lose some information.
Hold it, I'll quickly update my résumé before we resume the
conversation. What does this exposé expose? At least it gives a coup de
grâce to ASCII with grace.
'ANSI' (Windows code page 1252), will do most of what ASCII doesn't, as
far as western Europe (and the US, Canada, Australia and probably the
rest of the Americas) is concerned. Including euro and pound (€,£)
currency symbols.
ANSI could have been equivalent to the first 256 Unicode code points,
rather than just 128, if Unicode hadn't squandered codes 128 to 159 on
even more control codes, when it's difficult to see a use for most of
the 32 that ASCII already reserves.
Why would you care? I swear blind that you stated a few days back that
you, and hence your newly published language, couldn't care about
unicode. Have I got it wrong?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
