On 16/03/2016 15:27, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16-03-16 om 15:02 schreef Mark Lawrence:
On 16/03/2016 13:38, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16-03-16 om 12:07 schreef Mark Lawrence:
Raise the item on the python-ideas mailing list for the umpteenth time
then, and see how far you get.
I don't care enough. I do care about people using valid arguments.
Arguments have been made for and against. When the PEPs were rejected
are you saying that the arguments for acceptance were actually
stronger than the arguments for rejection?
No, I was just saying that your argument: "We've done without for 25
years" is invalid, because that would imply python should no longer make
any progress. Because any progress that will be made now, we've done
without for 25 years. -- Antoon
So putting something into the language that we don't actually need is
progress? Hum, in my book that's just plain weird.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
