Fillmore <fillmore_rem...@hotmail.com> writes: > Sorry guys. It was not my intention to piss off anyone...just trying > to understand how the languare works
Frustration is understandable when learning something new :-) Hopefully that can be a signal to take a breath, and compose messages to minimise frustration for the readers. > I guess that the answer to my question is: there is no such thing as a > one-element tuple, Certainly there is. Tuples – like any container type – can contain zero, one, or more items. >>> foo = () >>> bar = ("spam",) >>> baz = ("spam", "eggs") >>> blub = ("spam", "eggs", "beans") >>> len(foo) 0 >>> len(bar) 1 >>> len(baz) 2 >>> len(blub) 3 > and Python will automatically convert a one-element tuple to a > string... You appear to be confusing text representation, and program syntax, and the values themselves. Program syntax is the structured text you type, in order that Python should compile it and result in program code. That source code is text with a specific representation of values and statements. The values themselves are what exist within the Python process while it is executing your compiled code. There is no text representation of that, Python manipulates the values in an internal representation normally inaccessible to the program itself. The text representation that objects can generate on request is yet another matter; for convenience it sometimes matches a syntactic text that could be used to construct an equal value, but often that's not the case. It should not be thought of as any kind of universal rule. > Did I get this right this time? I hope that helps to distinguish the different matters that are confusing you. -- \ “Last year I went fishing with Salvador Dali. He was using a | `\ dotted line. He caught every other fish.” —Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list