Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes: > Fair enough. Let's instead say "commas create tuples", which is true > in all cases except the singleton empty tuple. Is that near enough > that we can avoid the detail?
It's a fine thing to say, because it's simply true. Commas create tuples. There are some tuples that cannot be created as a literal by comma. That does not make the statement untrue. They are not the *only* thing that creates tuples; parens can also create tuples. So we should avoid false statements on that score. > I'd rather be correct on the one-element case and wrong on the empty > than the other way around. To say “commas create tuples” is to say an unobjectionably true statement about Python syntax. It remains true as one continues to learn Python. To say “parens do not create tuples” is to lay a trap which needs to be de-fused at some point. Better IMO never to lay that trap. -- \ “It’s a great idea to come in unencumbered by dogma but you | `\ can’t also be unencumbered by evidence.” —Darren Saunders, | _o__) 2015-12-02 | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
