Sorry about the code indentation, I was using Pythonista (iOS), and it did
not have any problem with that indentation...
Here is a new set of the code:
## Write a method to approximate Euler's Number using Euler's Method
import math
class EulersNumber():
def __init__(self,n):
self.eulerSteps = n
self.e = self.EulersMethod(self.eulerSteps)
def linearApproximation(self,x,h,d): # f(x+h)=f(x)+h*f'(x)
return x + h * d
def EulersMethod(self, numberOfSteps): # Repeate linear approximation over
an even range
e = 1 # e**0 = 1
for step in range(numberOfSteps):
e = self.linearApproximation(e,1.0/numberOfSteps,e) # if f(x)= e**x,
f'(x)=f(x)
return e
def EulerStepWithGuess(accuracy,guessForN):
n = guessForN
e = EulersNumber(n)
while abs(e.e - math.e) > abs(accuracy):
n +=1
e = EulersNumber(n)
print('n={} \te= {} \tdelta(e)={}'.format(n,e.e,abs(e.e - math.e)))
return e
def EulersNumberToAccuracy(PowerOfTen):
x = 1
theGuess = 1
thisE = EulersNumber(1)
while x <= abs(PowerOfTen):
thisE = EulerStepWithGuess(10**(-1*x),theGuess)
theGuess = thisE.eulerSteps * 10
x += 1
return thisE
My problem is this: my attempt at Euler's Method involves creating a list
of numbers that is n long. Is there a way I can iterate over the linear
approximation method without creating a list of steps (maybe recursion, I
am a bit new at this). Ideally I'd like to perform the linearApproximation
method a arbitrary number of times (hopefully >10**10) and keep feeding the
answers back into itself to get the new answer. I know this will be
computationally time intensive, but how do I minimize memory usage (limit
the size of my list)? I also may be misunderstanding the problem, in which
case I am open to looking at it from a different perspective.
Thanks,
Derek
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:22 AM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Derek Klinge <schilke...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have been writing a python script to explore Euler's Method of
> > approximating Euler's Number. I was hoping there might be a way to make
> > this process work faster, as for sufficiently large eulerSteps, the
> process
> > below becomes quite slow and sometimes memory intensive. I'm hoping
> someone
> > can give me some insight as to how to optimize these algorithms, or ways
> I
> > might decrease memory usage. I have been thinking about finding a way
> > around importing the math module, as it seems a bit unneeded except as an
> > easy reference.
>
> Are you sure memory is the real problem here?
>
> (The first problem you have, incidentally, is a formatting one. All
> your indentation has been lost. Try posting your code again, in a way
> that doesn't lose leading spaces/tabs, and then we'll be better able
> to figure out what's going on.)
>
> If I'm reading your code correctly, you have two parts:
>
> 1) class EulersNumber, which iterates up to some specific count
> 2) Module-level functions, which progressively increase the count of
> constructed EulersNumbers.
>
> Between them, you appear to have an O(n*n) algorithm for finding a
> "sufficiently-accurate" representation. You're starting over from
> nothing every time. If, instead, you were to start from the previous
> approximation and add another iteration, that ought to be immensely
> faster.
>
> ChrisA
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
