On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:21:49 +1000
Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote:
> if verbose:
> verbiage = print
> else:
> def verbiage(*args): pass
I have never understood why the def couldn't start on the same line as
the else:
if verbose: verbiage = print
else: def verbiage(*args): pass
The colon effectively starts a block so why not allow it?
By the way, I think you meant "def verbiage(*args, **kws): pass"
> Then, instead of "if verbose: print(var)", you would use
> "verbiage(var)". Of course, you want something better than "verbiage"
> as your name; the nature of your verbose output might give a clue as
> to what name would work.
How about "print"?
if not verbose:
def print(*args, **kws): pass
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Vybe Networks Inc.
http://www.VybeNetworks.com/
IM:[email protected] VoIP: sip:[email protected]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
