Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > ... > Rather, the motivation was that a complex thing, with many moving parts, > has an unexplained implementation: a nested set of functions without > names to explain their part in the pattern.
In a previous reply, I have tried to explain (apparently without success) that the "thing" is not "complex" at all but a simple signature transform for a decorator definitition and that the nested function implementation is natural for this purpose. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
