"Marko Rauhamaa" wrote in message news:87vaulitxe....@elektro.pacujo.net...
"Frank Millman" <fr...@chagford.com>:
> I changed 'await self.close()', to
> 'asyncio.ensure_future(self.close())'.
>
> Problem solved.
A nice insight.
However, shouldn't somebody somewhere in your code be keeping track of
the returned task?
I don't know. What is the worst that could happen?
My way of looking at it is that it is similar to setTimeout() in javascript.
I am requesting that the enclosed function/coroutine be scheduled for
execution at the next available opportunity in the event loop. In
javascript, I don't keep track of it, I just assume that it will be executed
at some point. Is it not reasonable to do the same here?
Frank
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
