On 2016-12-31 01:59, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 30Dec2016 15:17, Deborah Swanson <pyt...@deborahswanson.net> wrote:
        Ever consider using conjunctions?

        if len(l1[st]) and not len(l2[st]):
                #0 is considered a false -- no need to test for "==0"
                #non-0 is considered true -- no need to test for ">0"
                #copy l1 to l2
        elif not len(l1[st]) and len(l2[st]):
                #copy l2 to l1
--
        Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
    wlfr...@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

That's a neat shortcut, len(a) instead of len(a)!= 0.  Thanks!

Also, for almost every python collection (lists, tuples, sets etc), python
boolean logic tests __nonzero__, which works off len() by default.

[snip]

For Python 2, it tries __nonzero__, or __len__ if that fails.

For Python 3, it tries __bool__, or __len__ if that fails.

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to