On 23.01.2017 14:28, Soni L. wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/01/17 11:18 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 23.01.2017 14:05, Soni L. wrote:
>>> Yeah but the dotequals operator has many other benefits:
>>>
>>> long_name .= __call__  # cast to callable
>>> long_name .= wrapped  # unwrap
>>> etc
>>>
>>> And it also looks neat.
>> I don't see this an being a particular intuitive way of writing
>> such rather uncommon constructs.
>>
>> The syntax is not clear (what if you have an expression on the RHS)
>> and it doesn't save you much in writing (if long_name is too long
>> simply rebind it under a shorter name for the purpose of the code
>> block).
> 
> It's literally sugar for repeating the name and moving the dot to the
> right. I think it's clearer than most other compound operators in that
> it doesn't affect precedence rules.
> 
> `x += y`, for any code `y`, is equivalent to `x = x + (y)`, not `x = x +
> y`.
> 
> `x .= y`, for any code `y`, is equivalent to `x = x . y`, not `x = x .
> (y)`.

Well, then please consider these:

x .= y + z
x .= y * z
x .= y.z
x .= y.z()

>> Also note that rebinding different objects to the same name
>> in the same block is often poor style and can easily lead to
>> hard to track bugs.
>>
> 
> Rebinding different objects to the same name in rapid succession
> is fine.

Not in my book :-)

It may be fine if the object type stays the same or
in those few cases, where you want to accept multiple
different types for a parameter and then coerce these
to a type that you use in the rest of the code block.

But even in those cases, debugging becomes easier if
you keep the original binding in place (since you then
know where the new values originated).

This is not good style...

x = 'abc'
x = len(x)
x = [x, 1]
x = ''.join(str(a) for a in x)
print (x)

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Experts (#1, Jan 23 2017)
>>> Python Projects, Coaching and Consulting ...  http://www.egenix.com/
>>> Python Database Interfaces ...           http://products.egenix.com/
>>> Plone/Zope Database Interfaces ...           http://zope.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: We implement business ideas - efficiently in both time and costs :::

   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
                      http://www.malemburg.com/

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to