Ah - this makes more sense. Did the implementation of 'fp' file-like object change in 2.4.1 and it no longer has a read()?
Andre. Anthony Botrel wrote: > Hi, > > in the call fp.read(8192) the function read() gets 2 arguments : <fp> and > <8192> > > Member functions implicitely get their object as first argument, this > is why you get this error. So you have 2 possibilities : either read() > doesn't take an argument anymore, or read() is not a member of fp. > > Anthony B. > > On 8/18/05, Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I am getting the following traceback after upgrading my app to Python >>2.4.1. It's telling me that there is an error in Parser.py. It tells >>me that 'fp.read(8192)' is given 2 arguments, but it is clearly not >>true. Does anybody know what's going on here? >> >>Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/enqueue.py", line >>252, in work >> worker(e.linkval, info) >> File "/opt/etext/bin/etreceive", line 30, in worker >> result = decode.searchfile(f) >> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line >>43, in searchfile >> return Email(f) >> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line >>510, in __init__ >> self.child.append(Email(mf)) >> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/site-packages/etext/decode.py", line >>404, in __init__ >> msg = Parser().parse(f) >> File "/opt/etext/lib/python2.4/email/Parser.py", line 65, in parse >> data = fp.read(8192) >>TypeError: read() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) >> >>Thanks, >>Andre. >> >>-- >> >>-- >>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >> -- ################################################################ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Andre Smirnov _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ CNS - DSE _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ 303 272-8352 / x78352 _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ Mailstop: UBRM05-203 _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ 500 Eldorado boulevard Broomfield, CO 80021 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
