> > Unsure why you mention C. Python has a solid and efficient > implementation of SNMP with PySNMP, and except a misunderstanding about > how SNMPv3 should work, it seems better to use it than relying on > Net-SNMP which has many bugs and nobody really willing to correct them. >
Wow. I'd like to excuse the authors of PySNMP: from what I had seen mentioned on internet, I thought it differs from Net-SNMP mainly in being written in pure Python and having lower performance. I wish I had skimmed through the PySNMP documentation before as I have done few minutes ago :-) PySNMP solves many of issues mentioned in my original message. I can just add a better (more suitable to me) "OSM" (object - SMI - mapper). You are right, Vincent: sorry for even mentioning Net-SNMP bindings. Milan -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
