Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> writes: > On 8/10/2017 10:28 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote: >> Every few years, the following syntax comes up for discussion, with some >> people >> saying it isn't obvious what it would do, and others disagreeing and saying >> that it is obvious. So I thought I'd do an informal survey. >> >> What would you expect this syntax to return? >> >> [x + 1 for x in (0, 1, 2, 999, 3, 4) while x < 5] > > I expect it to continue to raise SyntaxError as I would be flabbergasted > if something so awful were to be accepted into Python.
Correct: SyntaxError: invalid syntax -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list