On 8/11/17 6:37 AM, Python wrote: > Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> Python <python@example.invalid>: >> >>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >>> I didn't disagree with any of these statements about __hash__, but only >>> your statement about id and __eq__: >>> >>>> id() is actually an ideal return value of __hash__(). The only >>>> criterion is that the returned number should be different if the >>>> __eq__() is False. That is definitely true for id() >>> >>> nan is a clear, simple, undeniable counterexample to that claim. >> >> Still, I don't see the point you are trying to make. > > You do have a cognitive disease, don't you? > > >
Maybe it's time to just drop it, rather than starting to insult each other? --Ned. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
