On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:19 AM, Richard Damon <rich...@damon-family.org> wrote: > One idea does come to mind though, would it be reasonable, and somewhat > Pythonic, for a class to define member functions like __ref__ and __unref__ > (or perhaps some other name) that if defined, would be called every time a > name was bound or unbound to an object?
Just a thought, here: would __ref__ be called every time a new function-local name is bound to an object? For instance, when a method is called, and its 'self' parameter gets set to that object? That miiiiiight be a little problematic. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
