On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:08:10 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Is there a good reason not to support "" as the empty prefix? > > Well, the "empty prefix" is not an "empty" prefix, it's *no* prefix. The > result is not ":tag" instead of "prefix:tag", the result is "tag".
That makes sense, thanks. -- Steve -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
