No, i did not write that, it's not Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote rather ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: *AAKASH JANA* <aakashjana2...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 21:15 Subject: Re: Python, Be Bold! - The Draft To: Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <arj.pyt...@gmail.com>
Please forward it to aakashjana2...@gmail.com On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, 01:21 Michael Torrie, <torr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/6/20 10:24 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote: > > Maybe but if you know or have heard of Julia the language. You will > realise > > its going to take over what python gives us. So i think there is urgent > > need for upgrades to newer versions of python to make basic tasks on > python > > way quicker. > > No it sure won't. You can't possibly make such a blanket statement. > Julia might replace python for some users, perhaps those involved in > data science, but Python stands on its own merits. And currently that > standing is pretty good. If that changes in the future, oh well. > Languages come and go. Besides all that, if some users find Julia fits > their need better, why is that a bad thing? You talk like it's a zero > sum game. It's not. I don't see where this urgency is coming from. > > Put in another way, Python fills the needs of many users at present. > This isn't going to magically change because you see something that is > deficient in your opinion. > > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
