On 24/08/2020 00:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:51 AM Rob Cliffe via Python-list
<python-list@python.org> wrote:
Let me describe my actual use case. I am developing a large Python
program (in Windows, working in DOS boxes) and I constantly want to
modify it and re-run it. What I have been doing is to make it respond
to a hotkey by calling itself via os.system. The problem is that if I
do this 50 times I am left with 51 instances still running, each one
waiting for the next to finish. That's actually OK, except that when I
finally shut it down, it takes a long time (about 2.5 sec per instance).
I have found a workaround: a small shell program which calls the main
program (wth os.system), then when the latter exits, calls it again (if
required). Starting the main program is slightly slower, but acceptably
so; shutting it down becomes constant time.
But I would still like to be able to do it as I originally planned, if
possible. Not least because I may have other uses for program
"chaining" in future.
Hmm. Python isn't really set up to make this sort of thing easy.
I guess this sentence pretty well answers my whole post. :-(
My
recommendations, in order of priority, would be:
1) What you're doing, but with a dedicated exit code that means
"changed, please restart me"
That is pretty much what I am now doing. I return (to a shell program)
exit codes which mean "such-and-such a hotkey was hit, please restart me".
2) The same thing but entirely within Python. Instead of importing
modules, manually load them and exec the source code. (No relation to
the process-level exec - I'm talking about the exec function.)
Updating is way WAY faster, but it isn't the same thing as restarting.
Your code has to be built with this in mind.
Ah, there's the rub. This program will be run stand-alone at client
sites and I need to test it "as is". As I see it I can't responsibly
rewrite the way it works (if I'm understanding you more or less correctly).
3) Similar to #2 but using a language that's designed with that kind
of thing in mind. Off topic for this list but it's something I've done
on a number of occasions, so I'd be happy to discuss that with you.
No, no, no, Python is for me! (Seriously: rewriting in another language
would be far too time-consuming and *error-prone*. Not to mention
unenjoyable.)
4) Any other option available
5) Messing with exec on Windows
Which I've been doing, but without success.
Thanks again, Chris.
Rob
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
