On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 19:38, <c.bu...@posteo.jp> wrote: > > Dear Chris, > thanks for asking back and my apologize for being to broad in my way of > asking (in a foreign language). > > Am 19.12.2022 07:40 schrieb Chris Angelico: > > Hmm, then I'm not sure what you're *losing* here. The problem, as I > > understand it, is that the scripts are getting installed into > > /usr/local/bin (which is on PATH at the time they're installed), but > > pkexec has a restricted PATH. So if you use which before pkexec'ing, > > wouldn't you find the scripts, and then be able to run them without > > regard to PATH? > > Absolut correct. This works. > > The question is if this is a "good" or "elegant" way from the viewpoint > of different communities/projects (e.g. Python, setuptools, pip, other > build-systems, distros, something I forgot). >
Ah! Then, my response is: Yes, it is definitely a good/elegant solution. I've often created scripts that install into somewhere (eg systemd, cron, ifupdown) by using 'which' to figure something out, and then posting the full path into the corresponding file. It's a convenient way to ensure that the exact same program would be used. Notably, "which python3" will ensure that you run on the currently-active Python interpreter; this includes virtual environments. Very convenient. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
