On 2/26/2023 8:40 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 2023-02-26 16:56, Hen Hanna wrote:
On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 6:41:01 AM UTC-8, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 2/25/2023 8:12 PM, Hen Hanna wrote: > 2. the rude guy ('dn')
hasn't offered a single word of comment that's directly relevant to
it. > > -------- but he did offer related stuff which he thinks i
should be [grateful] for
Please let's stop the ad hominem messages. If someone doesn't like a
particular person's messages, send them to spam or don't read them.
If too many people start to get too rude or personal, remind the
whole list of the guidelines for respectful participation. If you
feel that someone's contribution was especially helpful in part
because it was concise and to the point, you could say that.
yes. let's stop...
If you (Thomas Passin) feel that someone's contribution was
especially helpful in part because it was
concise and to the point, you could say that.
and pls don't hesitate to reproduce such a
comment.
i'm sure a few others were also rude, but it was the rudest of them
all ('dn') that told me to read some [Code of Conduct] document.
-------- Do not EVER do that again.
Another rude guy who "asked" me why i write in a Hard-to-read
way.... Why don't you at least also make a comment that's
On-Topic besides the insulting remark ?
so far, i think Paul Rubin's post (in another thread) was esp.
concise, informative, --- but he's also made a comment about
'shunting' beginners (questions) to a concentration camp, and
sounded a bit like a cold-hearted (or warm-hearted) Nazi officer /
scientist.
Oh dear. An example of Godwin's Law.
+1 Nicely put!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
