On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:55:22 PM UTC-7, gst wrote: > Le mardi 14 mars 2023 à 02:32:23 UTC-4, Clint Olsen a écrit : > I'm not asyncio expert or even not advanced user, but using a simple list to > hold the jobs to execute and fill it as necessary after results gathering is > not good ? > > ``` > @async > def execute_jobs(jobs: List["Job"]): > while len(jobs) > 0: > # launch_job(s) > # gather_job(s)_result(s) > # append_jobs_if_desired > ```
The problem with this implementation is that most/all of the code calling this app is not async code. So, we'd need a method (and thread) to communicate between the sync and async worlds. A possible implementation is here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59650243/communication-between-async-tasks-and-synchronous-threads-in-python So, while this is certainly possible, it would be much more straightforward to just call asyncio.run() more than once. Thanks, -Clint -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
