On 13/05/2026 14.33, Stefan Ram wrote:
"Michael F. Stemper" <[email protected]> wrote or quoted:
for variable in angles if options.angle else comps:
, is fine, but I think what would be a bit clearer might be,
variables = angles if options.angle else comps
for variable in variables:
I ended up going with something quite similar:
#####################################################
if options.angle:
junk = sys.stdout.write( "0.00 " )
variables = [pi/20*k for k in range(1,8)]
else:
junk = sys.stdout.write( " 0% " )
variables = [0.1*k for k in range(1,8)]
# ...
# Loop over a range of angle or compensation values
for variable in variables:
# Do stuff
####################################################
Much clearer and less "cute".
(Yes, the range of angles changed from my prototype.)
--
Michael F. Stemper
What happens if you play John Cage's "4'33" at a slower tempo?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-list.python.org
