On 9/27/05, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 03:35 PM 9/26/2005 -0700, Micah Elliott wrote: > >Please read/comment/vote. This circulated as a pre-PEP proposal > >submitted to c.l.py on August 10, but has changed quite a bit since > >then. I'm reposting this since it is now "Open (under consideration)" > >at <http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0350.html>. > > My suggestion: implement some tools, use them for a while, and come back > with more focused use cases to show why only this format can work, and why > the Python core developers should therefore use it. I'm not saying that > you can't have an informational PEP unless it should be used in the stdlib, > mind you. Just pointing out that if you can't convince the core developers > it's useful, I'm thinking you'll have a hard time convincing the community > at large to actually use it. You need to actually have a better mousetrap > to present before you ask people to move their cheese. :) >
+1 I agree with PJE almost entirely. Peace Bill Mill bill.mill at gmail.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
