Paul Rubin wrote: > Brian Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Without a clear idea of the nature of the proposal, it is impossible >>to assess it's costs and benefits. So could a proponent of optional >>declarations please provide a more clear proposal? > > > There is no proposal on the table. There's a discussion of how this > stuff can work, and whether it's useful. As for how the compiler > deals with imported modules, see for example Common Lisp or Haskell or > ML--how do they do it?
Except that you are providing neither useful input on how it could work nor on whether it would be useful. All you are doing is telling people to do research on other languages (that resumably do things in a way more to your liking). In conclusion, this thread is unlikely to make any useful progress. Cheers, Brian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
