"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Erlang? > > Guess what, worked with that, too :) And let me assure you - it does > have pretty much runtime type error issues. It's interpreted.
Yes, it makes no attempt at being statically typed. It's like Python that way, AFAIK. > Easy cases are easy... The thing is: I'm all for typechecking as long > as it doesn't burden me. In FP it doesn't, as the expressional power is > way better. But in JAVA, it does. And just doing wishful-thinking about > that Python should do better that won't help... :) How about Lisp? It seems to do some good there, without getting in the way. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
