John Bokma wrote: <cut> > You mean like the lamp that keeps burning forever, like Philips has? >
No more like all the hydrogen technologies that shell has in their possession for the last decades and only recently has begun to restart those projects. >> Although Commodore where never serious competitors, > > Because there programming skills were as worse as MS? I mean, their > BASIC had only 2 instuctions: PEEK and POKE? eehm Amiga? <cut> > > Yet you call NT slightly better compared to Windows 95. So you have no > clue what you're talking about. So I see you never worked serious with 3.5 . > >> hey I make money of them administrating them, >> however to state that if we didn't had MS we would been in the IT >> stone ages is blatantly wrong, > > Now there is truth. > >> I think we would have been a lot >> further > > No, since companies are just companies, not little gods like some want > them to be. > >> then where we are now. Perhaps we even had a other mainstream >> architecture like sparcs and powerpc's. > > But "crippled" like Intel. Yeah right sparc is crippled... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
