"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Instead, you outline a class of actions and tag them
>> all as illegal. That's why we have laws against assault and battery
>> and unsafe driving. And laws against exercising monopoly power in an
>> unfair manner.
> Interesting how you, again, equate a gun and an argument. It is very
> important to you to justify responding to arguments with guns. However, I
> reject that premise at its roots, not just in your application of it.
Another straw man. I never mentioned the word "gun" at all, and none
of the crimes I discussed require a gun.
You apparently aren't interested in constructive intercourse on the
question. You're just interesting in knocking down your own
arguments. Personally, I'd rather not watch you masterbate.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
