[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This actually brings us back to the jest of F. previous post, that > documentation is question of multiple source reference, and yes that > you have to work the field (Google search, newgroups, cookbooks, > source-code, et al) a little bit to get some information.
while I don't care much about the "since I don't understand the reference manual, I demand that some experts should rewrite it for me, for free" line of reasoning, I still think it would be a good idea to make it easier to navigate the existing material. I wrote about this back in may: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-May/280751.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-May/280755.html http://effbot.org/zone/idea-seealso.htm but, iirc, only got "wikis rulez" and "enough with that comp.sci crap" responses. > In time, one goes from newbie to casual-user, to regular-user and > createds his own setof useful references ... exactly. </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
