ankit wrote: > I checked for it and here are my comments on it: > libxml2dom has Alpha release . So there may be some bugs in it. In our > project we cant take risk to move back after deciding for one. Thanks > for your reply.
Understood. I accept that there's some way to go before libxml2dom can be considered mature. > I checked some other options like libgdome2. Can you make some comments > on that? Sorry, but I've only investigated the libxml2 DOM libraries for other languages in passing - I haven't actually used any of them. > The reason for using minidom is its simplicity for traversing document > tree. Right. > And also I want schema support in the package along with minidom > support. > Can you provide any other option(package) which would suffice this > requirement. Whilst lxml also wraps libxml2, that package doesn't expose a DOM API as far as I know, although one was once proposed/discussed/partially developed. Here's a link to that project: http://codespeak.net/lxml/ > As far as I know no other package instead of libxml2 provides schema > support. > Am I right. I think you'd be best served asking on the XML-SIG mailing list and searching its archives. See here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/xml-sig/ Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
