Tim Hochberg wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Currently I'm on 149 characters in <urgh> one line - 128 without >> spaces/newlines. (it'd be three characters shorter if it didn't have >> to end with a "\n") > > > It'll be interesting to see what the short 1-line answers look like. I > have a hard time seeing how that's done. It'll especially be interesting > to see if we're all using similar tricks or if the multiline attemps > take a distinctly different tack than the single line attempts. > > Currently, I'm down to 137 characters now in 6 lines. There's very > little left to trim at this point, so I don't know that I'll be able to > knock it down any further using my current approach. And since I don't > have any other approaches in the wings, I may be about washed up. > > I think my main interest will be to see what different algorithms are successful. I suspect I may have chosen the wrong approach to start with since I stuck at 150 characters (1 line, no extraneous whitespace), but then I started again with a different algorithm and I'm down to one line of 137 characters but nowhere obvious to go from there...
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list