Op 2006-01-11, Mike Meyer schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Op 2006-01-10, Mike Meyer schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Now you can take the practical option and decide that programmatically >>>> it make no sense to compare a specific couple of values and throw an >>>> exception in this case, but it doesn't matter much which test you are >>>> conducting at that point. >>> Can you provide a case where having a test for equality throw an >>> exception is actually useful? >> I'm not going to bother with that. > > Since you're being vague about what you want,
I would like some consistency. Either all comparisons between objects of different types throw an exception by default or none does. > and won't provide > examples to show why you want things to behave whatever way you want, > I can't really say much else about it. Did you see examples that show why Guido wants things to behave whatever way he wants? I didn't and I didn't see examples from you either. Guido's idea is a change from current behaviour. Each time I saw some argue a change here, people seem to expect a use case from that person. So why ask a use case of me and just accepy Guido's idea. -- Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
