Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Shalabh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >>Hm. Am I the only one not particularly impressed? > > > no. > > the design is alright (if a bit too "bland business"), but the little I've > seen of the > information architecture and the backend infrastructure feels like 1998 > (which, > I suppose, was when the project started...)
Could you expand on why the backend infrastructure and information architecture feel like 1998? (it's a bit of an abstract comment and doesn't offer anything constructive). An example of a site info architecture that feels like 2005 would be good. Also an example of a backend architecture that isn't like 1998 would be good too. Tim Parkin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
