Bengt Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > >Personally, I'd always use (depending on guesses regarding lengths of > >lists) [x for x in l1 if x in l2] or the setified equivalent, of course. > > > Perhaps newbies should be advised that > > [x for x in l1 if x in set(l2)] > > is not a (well) setified equivalent? I could see them being tempted.
You mean, newbies should be advised that Python does NOT hoist any computations whatsoever from the body of a loop (including LCs and genexps), so if you want anything hoisted you need to hoist it yourself? Yes, it is a point worth making, since the lack of hoisting is a frequent cause of performance loss. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
