looping wrote: > For Python developers around. > >>From Python 2.5 doc: > The list of base classes in a class definition can now be empty. As an > example, this is now legal: > class C(): > pass > > nice but why this syntax return old-style class, same as "class C:", > and not the new style "class C(object):" ? > Old-style class are somewhat deprecated and could be almost always be > replaced by new-style class, so this syntax could be a nice shortcut to > create them. > > Am I wrong or is there something that I've missed ?
class C(): is meant to be synonymous with class C: and therefore cannot create a new-style class. Georg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
