"Pierre Quentel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I added an entry in Wikipedia for information, just like other Python > web frameworks have already done. If the style doesn't fit Wikipedia's > I'm sorry and willing to learn how to improve it ; the reason I read > was "Obvious, if elaborate, link spam. Really should be speedied, but I > can't find a CSD that fits this". I don't really understand why it's > called a spam, I don't know what a CSD is and I don't know either who > deleted the prod template, not me anyway. I'll take wikipedia people's > advice into account anyway
CSD = criteria for speedy deletion, <http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:CSD> Prod = proposed deletion. Anyone is allowed to un-prod it, and in this case someone did. If nobody un-prods it after 5 days, it gets deleted automatically. That doesn't apply here, because the article did get un-prodded. Next probably comes AFD, article for deletion. That's a consensus process: there's a 5 day community discussion about what to do about the article and then an admin comes along and implements the decision. This article will probably get AFD'd (i.e. entered into the discussion process). When that happens, I'll recommend keeping the article but editing it considerably. Basically it needs to be rewritten as a straightforward description that doesn't sound like advertising. If there's an AFD, a notice will appear at the top of the article announcing the AFD and giving a link to participate in the discussion. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
