Fredrik Lundh wrote:

> Pierre Rouleau wrote:
> 
> 
>>I can understand the design decision not to give object a __dict__, but
>>I wonder if i'd be a good idea to have a class that derives from object
>>and has a __dict__ to be in the standard library.
> 
> 
> so you can replace one line of code in some of your programs with
> an import statement ?
> 

ok... I should have said "something like the built-in object type" 
instead of "standard library"...

--
Pierre Rouleau
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to