vdrab wrote: >> """ >> E.g., after "a = 1; >> b = 1", >> a and b may or may not refer to the same object with the value one, >> depending on the implementation, >> """ > > But when in a specific implementation this property _does_ hold for > ints having value 1, I expect the > same behaviour for ints with other values than 1. > I guess I'm kind of weird that way. >
Are you telling us that you *had* read that doc, and tripped because it says "depending on the implementation", when it should say "at the choice of the implementation" ? That's indeed a bit weird, imo. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
