Patches item #1021881, was opened at 2004-09-03 10:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=581351&aid=1021881&group_id=86916
Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Edward Loper (edloper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Include the name of a module's package in its buffer name. Initial Comment: Add an option to include a module's package name in its buffer name. E.g. if module `module.py' is contained in a package whose dotted name is `a.b.c', then its buffer will be named "module.py (a.b.c)" instead of just "module.py". When using complex package hierarchies, this can be useful for keeping track of where a module is in the hierarchy. It's especially useful for keeping track of __init__.py files. In the patch, the option is turned on by default; but that could be changed. See the docs for the custom variable py-name-buffers-with-packages. For more info about file-name-handler-alist (which is used to implement the change), see <http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp- manual/html_node/elisp_403.html> ("Making Certain File Names 'Magic'"). It should work under both emacs and xemacs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2005-01-09 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 I backed this change out. With it in place it seems that buffer names are annotated with "<2>" even if they are the only buffer associated with a given file name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-10-23 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Looks good. Checked in as v 4.65. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edward Loper (edloper) Date: 2004-09-12 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195958 Fixed a bug in the patch where the rename would fail if two buffers with the same name were opened. (Also, used context diff instead of unified diff.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edward Loper (edloper) Date: 2004-09-06 21:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195958 Attatching file, take 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=581351&aid=1021881&group_id=86916 _______________________________________________ Python-mode mailing list Python-mode@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
